Parenting Plans

Gender Roles and Custody Reform: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Laboratory – audio download

In the mid-1990s, a few high profile mothers who faced the prospect of losing custody of their children captured the attention of the media and led to cries of judicial bias. One of these mothers was O. J. Simpson prosecutor, assistant DA Marcia Clark.

Dr. Warshak was asked to address the issue of gender bias at a 1995 international conference in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

He begins by discussing the manner in which gender stereotypes have shaped custody decisions throughout history. Next he takes up the question of whether, and in what form, gender bias is part of the current custody scene. Avoiding simplistic approaches to the topic, this presentation examines a range of criticisms leveled at the best-interests-of-the-child standard, from both women’s and men’s advocacy groups.

Dr. Warshak explains why allegations of systematic discrimination are difficult to evaluate and he gives examples of how advocacy groups and the media misrepresent the state of research in order to support their preconceived opinions.

Conceding that the absence of reliable data on the question of gender bias in court decisions invites rhetoric in place of reason, Dr. Warshak next addresses the wider issue of whether gender bias rules the ninety percent of cases decided outside of court. Dr. Warshak shows why the question “Which parent should get custody?” lies at the heart of gender bias claims. He then examines four explanations that have been offered to defend the mother’s preferential claim to custody, and concludes that the best scientific evidence proves that neither nature nor experience gives women a monopoly on parental competence either before or after divorce. This section offers a more detailed analysis and criticism of the primary parent standard than in Dr. Warshak’s previous work.

The presentation concludes with a brief discussion of research findings demonstrating the need for a new approach to custody decisions that guarantees children their birthright to both parents. Dr. Warshak makes a simple suggestion to ensure that custody reform reflects the needs of children rather than the demands of adults.

Approximately 30 minutes

The Approximation Rule Survey: The American Law Institute’s Proposed Reform Misses the Target

The Approximation Rule Survey: The American Law Institute’s Proposed Reform Misses the Target

The American Law Institute (ALI) proposed that in contested physical custody cases, the court should allocate to each parent a proportion of the child’s time that approximates the proportion of time each spent performing caretaking functions in the past. The rule is intended to function as a default presumption in disputes decided by a court and as a backdrop for pre-trial negotiations. Proponents of the approximation rule assume that the adoption of the rule, by Continue reading

Obstacles and Controversies in the Pursuit of Children’s Best Interests

Obstacles and Controversies in the Pursuit of Children’s Best Interests

This pamphlet is an expanded version of an enthusiastically received keynote address delivered by Dr. Warshak in Arizona in 2000. It proposes the types of reforms necessary for parents, professionals, and courts to better define the best interests of children.

Dr. Warshak calls for more diligence in custody evaluations and in reviews of the literature. He criticizes policies which automatically  discourage joint custody when divorcing parents are in Continue reading

Overnight Access for Young Children

Overnight Access for Young Children

In 1994 the Texas Supreme Court Committee on Child Custody was considering a recommendation of no overnight access between children under the age of three and their non custodial parents. In this written commentary to the Committee, Dr. Warshak argues that
such a proposal is inconsistent with child developmental theory, research, and common sense. He points out the significant benefits Continue reading

Keeping Fathers Involved

Keeping Fathers Involved

This essay, based on remarks to the American Orthopsychiatry Association in 1994, focuses on the role mental health professionals play in perpetuating gender stereotypes that interfere with healthy father-child relationships after divorce.

Dr. Warshak analyzes the biases that support such practices as Continue reading